Presentation does not describe the project goals, data, methods, or results. This includes presentations that omit critical information, have substantial errors, or that are too confusing for stakeholders to follow.
Most slides do not include most items from the checklist (0-2 out of 5).
Presentation does not convey the intended content, or most answers to questions are unclear or inappropriate. This includes presentations that are not comprehensible or that skip intended content, as well as non-responses, incorrect responses, or responses that don’t resolve the question.
The notebook’s explanation of a project’s value is missing, inaccurate, or difficult to understand. This includes projects that do not actually have value for any real-world problem/stakeholder.
The notebook’s description of the data’s source or properties is missing, inaccurate, difficult to understand, or irrelevant to the real-world problem of interest. This includes projects using data that are not appropriate for solving the chosen real-world problem.
1) Data preparation is not fully reproducible using instructions and code that is contained in, imported by, or referenced by the demonstration notebook, and/or 2) preparation steps could not have valid rationales for why they will help with solving the real-world problem addressed by the project.
Multiple models are not developed, or the differences between models could not have valid rationales for why they will help solve the real-world problem.
No final model is explicitly chosen, the final model is not correctly evaluated using holdout test data, or the chosen metric is not appropriate for the real-world problem.
Code is mostly not runnable, or is difficult to read, repetitive, or improperly cited.
Repo does not include most items from the checklist (0-3 out of 7).
To ensure that you meet each of the objectives for this project, you'll want to consult the rubric below in conjunction with the project checklist.